Klaipėda challenge
LTU, Klaipėda, 2019-08-03

Temps intermédiaires du compétiteur Fedotovas Andrius

Jour 1

Classe J-VYR

Route 51.0 km

PCTemps Erreur **PositionAstérix
absoluintervallemeilleur différence *
 Dép9:00:00         
1409:01:111:110:33 0:38115% 0:138
10
Šumskas G.
2399:02:311:200:45 0:3578%  11
16
Kavaliauskas R.
3389:04:251:541:08 0:4668%  21
29
Kavaliauskas R., Petrulis V.
4379:05:381:130:45 0:2862%  27
33
Kavaliauskas R.
5369:06:431:050:42 0:2355%  26
32
Ralys V.
6359:08:321:491:08 0:4160%  24
27
Cibas D.
7349:09:471:150:53 0:2242%  24
27
Ralys V., Cibas D.
8339:11:461:590:52 1:07129% 0:2828
34
Ralys V., Cibas D.
9329:13:091:231:10 0:1319%  5Antanavičius J.
10319:14:551:460:57 0:4986%  27
37
Mickus D., Liubartas A.
11419:17:522:572:56 0:011%  2Baukys R.
12429:23:515:592:55 3:04105% 0:5229
39
Kavaliauskas R., Petrulis V.
13449:32:188:278:08 0:194%  2Baukys R.
14459:34:372:191:34
1:30
0:45
0:49
48%
54%
 21
29
Cibas D.
Urbelionis K.
15479:36:081:311:20
1:00
0:11
0:31
14%
52%
 6
8
Timonin P.
Ambrazevičiūtė G.
16469:38:582:501:21 1:29110% 0:2813
19
Cibas D.
17489:40:391:411:08 0:3349%  14
20
Narvydas S.
1843          
19499:53:48 7:14
 
     Zaveckas A., Mikalajūnas M.
20509:58:264:381:22 3:16239% 2:1432
46
Petrulis V.
215210:07:549:284:00 5:28137% 2:2731
45
Kriukas D.
225310:12:504:561:57 2:59153% 1:3130
38
Kavaliauskas R.
235410:16:293:391:27 2:12152% 1:0631
45
Petrulis V.
245510:26:3310:043:38 6:26177% 3:4230
44
Kavaliauskas R.
255610:36:109:374:47 4:50101% 1:1327
39
Dobilinskas M.
265710:54:1718:072:55 15:12521% 13:0032
44
Cibas D.
275811:00:326:153:25 2:5083% 0:1531
45
Kavaliauskas R.
285911:14:1013:388:28 5:1061%  26
37
Cibas D.
296011:16:402:301:46 0:4442%  31
45
Petrulis V.
306111:19:553:152:25 0:5034%  22
32
Petrulis V.
316211:42:1822:238:30 13:53163% 7:2828
42
Kavaliauskas R.
326312:06:5124:338:24 16:09192% 9:4927
37
Ralys V.
336412:26:5920:085:41 14:27254% 10:1029
43
Petrilionis M.
346512:34:317:322:37 4:55188% 2:5731
45
Cibas D.
356712:46:2211:514:58 6:53139% 3:0831
45
Dobilinskas M.
366913:06:4020:188:09 12:09149% 6:0030
44
Griškonis T.
377013:16:359:555:12 4:4391% 0:4823
30
Dobilinskas M.
387213:36:1219:373:43 15:54428% 13:0632
46
Griškonis T.
397313:39:463:341:53 1:4189% 0:1630
40
Cibas D.
407413:43:183:322:43
2:34
0:49
0:58
30%
38%
 17
23
Liktorius L.
Kazachenko K.
417513:53:5610:385:31 5:0793% 0:5725
35
Mickus D.
427613:57:263:301:22 2:08156% 1:0625
37
Ralys V.
437714:30:0732:4113:56 18:45135% 8:1431
43
Ralys V.
447814:37:577:503:50 4:00104% 1:0631
41
Griškonis T.
457914:41:403:432:07 1:3676%  26
34
Cibas D.
468014:49:037:233:09
2:55
4:14
4:28
134%
153%
2:1629
39
Griškonis T.
Rogal A.
478114:50:091:060:29 0:37128% 0:1531
40
Dobilinskas M., Ralys V.
488314:53:052:561:21
1:17
1:35
1:39
117%
129%
0:4127
41
Šumskas G.
Petrov S.
498414:55:212:160:51 1:25167% 0:4732
46
Ralys V., Cibas D.
508714:56:120:510:51 -0:06-12%  1Fedotovas A.
518814:58:492:372:27 0:107%  2Baukys R.
529015:07:248:355:19 3:1661%  23
33
Cibas D.
539115:11:033:391:48 1:51103% 0:3029
35
Mickus D.
549215:25:3514:327:50 6:4286% 0:4729
43
Lukaševičius V.
559315:33:588:233:36 4:47133% 2:0431
40
Šumskas G.
569415:45:0811:106:07 5:0383% 0:2631
43
Šumskas G.
579515:54:008:521:58 6:54351% 5:2531
45
Cibas D.
589615:55:301:300:51
0:43
0:39
0:47
76%
109%
0:1518
30
Zubkus A.
Urbelionis K.
599715:57:051:350:42 0:53126% 0:2116
29
Lukaševičius V.
6010015:57:350:300:14 0:16114%  28
41
Dobilinskas M., Ralys V.
Zaniauskas N.
6110116:01:173:421:33 2:09139% 0:5927
41
Ralys V.
6210216:03:131:561:04 0:5281%  23
36
Vasiuninas R.
6310316:12:529:391:33 8:06523% 6:5626
38
Timonin P., Ralys V., Cibas D., Žigilėjus A.
6410416:15:322:401:30 1:1078%  21
30
Cibas D.
6510516:22:567:241:48 5:36311% 4:1528
38
Šumskas G.
6610716:31:318:353:55 4:40119% 1:4329
43
Cibas D.
 10716:31:59         
Résultat7:33:193:19:11
3:10:58
4:06:25
4:07:24
-0:06
128%
130%
-6%
-12%
2:00:1430
44

* la différence positive est entre le temps du participant et le meilleur temps, la différence negative est entre le temps du participant et le deuxième meilleur temps, si le temps du participant est le meilleur.

** l'erreur est enregistrée si le participant est derrière son temps de plus de 10 secondes. Les erreurs de plus de 1 minute sont éliminées du calcul de graphique.